Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual duration of service almost violates your entire service construction like a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming this sort of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor on the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents from the boy or girl don't approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance facing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
However it is actually made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities issue to law. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain respect with the family shed in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security of your house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been reached. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated over. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight offered to any reported judgment might more info depend on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[seven]
We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is a law that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, alternatively than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Have you been looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for your case or search for your person. Information over the site is updated every 24 hrs at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found around the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party as well as the case shall be decided from the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
Any court could seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
States also ordinarily have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family law and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case regulation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in New York is not really binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may possibly help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more